Skip to main content
Platform Update2 min read

Correcting the record: how profile updates work

Subjects and readers can request corrections. An outline of the intended process, what evidence is required, and how corrections are logged.

Editorial Desk · Global Leadership and Investors Editorial Desk

Abstract placeholder graphic for the sample article on the corrections process

A directory that publishes information about identifiable people needs a working correction route, and it needs to be visible rather than buried. The planned process accepts requests from the subject of a profile, from an organisation named on it, and from readers who can point to a source.

A correction request is expected to identify the specific claim in dispute and, where the claim is factual, to name a source that contradicts it. Requests that dispute a factual claim without a counter-source are still logged: the affected claim is marked as verified while an editor checks the original sourcing.

Where a correction is made, the profile's last-reviewed date is updated and the change is recorded. Where a request is declined, the reason is communicated to the requester.

Continue reading

Related insights

View all
  • Platform Update5 July 20264 min read

    How this directory verifies an investor profile

    An explanation of the sourcing standard applied to every profile: what counts as a public source, how conflicting reports are handled, and why some fields are deliberately left blank.

    Source: Global Leadership and Investors Editorial DeskRead more
  • Platform Update2 July 20263 min read

    What an editorial ranking does and does not measure

    The ranking scores documented public influence against a published methodology. It is not a wealth list, and this article explains the distinction in detail.

    Source: Global Leadership and Investors Editorial DeskRead more